How do you know this tick isn't an insect? The easiest thing to notice is that insects have 3 pairs of legs (6 of them) while this tick has 4 pairs (8 legs). Also, insects have 3 body regions (head, thorax and abdomen) while this tick appears to just have a head and a body. This tick is a good arthropod, but it never could be confused for an insect. Both ticks and insects are members of the phylum Arthropoda, but ticks, along with spiders, are members of the class Arachnida, while insects belong to the class Insecta.
From nature's point of view, the combination of being
joint legged and not having a backbone seems to be a good one, because
The word "successful" needs to be defined, for many humans would consider mammals to be earth's most successful group of animals, since humans are mammals, and humans are obviously Earth's "top dogs." However, the human standard for "success" isn't necessarily the only one. From a biological perspective, animal groups are "successful" if...
In these terms, humans don't look particularly successful. For one reason, there's just one species of us. If we do something really dumb and end up going extinct, there won't be another human-like species to evolve into the brain-using "niche" we're presently occupying. Current thought is that during the evolution of the human species there have been several species of the genus Homo -- several kinds of humans, such as the Neatherthals -- but the other human kinds went extinct (like the Neatherthals), possibly because we Homo sapiens killed them off.
Moreover, there's still a big question as to whether we'll ever overcome our enemy -- which is ourselves. Shall we destroy ourselves in nuclear or biological war, or by continuing to poison the earth with our pollution? It's often said that if anything can survive a nuclear holocaust or a poisoned earth, it's a cockroach. And cockroaches are insects, which are arthropods!
What makes arthropods so successful? Here are some of the most obvious evolutionary advances that arthropods show over the simpler, more "primitive" mollusks and segmented worms:
We need to talk more about this exoskeleton -- an "outside skeleton" -- because it's one of "nature's greatest inventions" -- one of the main features responsible for arthropods being so successful. Below you can see a pillbug shedding its old exoskeleton. The old exoskeleton is dark, while the fresh, still-soft pillpug is white:
If you're a land animal wanting to move around faster than a snail or an earthworm, you need muscles and you need stiffness. Stiffness is important because muscles must be attached to something secure, and the appendages they move must be stiff, or else they'll flop and flap, instead of taking steps, or raising hands or feet. Unskeletonized flesh can artfully ripple, wiggle, and elongate and shorten, but that's nothing compared to a cockroach's ability to skitter across the kitchen floor.
Arthropod exoskeletons serve the same functions as our human skeletons, which are inside-the-body endoskeletons. The question arises, then, "If exoskeletons are so great, why don't humans and elephants have them?"
It happens that, because of the general physics of large and small bodies, endoskeletons work better in land animals over, say, three inches long, while exoskeletons are best for smaller land animals. Anyone who has seen an oversized ripe watermelon burst during a modest mishandling knows how fragile rigid coverings are for large, heavy bodies. On the other hand, it's hard to imagine a Ladybird Beetle crammed with the numbers of highly specialized bones a human has.
Moreover, exoskeletons have at least two major drawbacks, even for small animals:
You can review books about arthropods in general, available at Amazon.com, by clicking here.
this page as:
Conrad, Jim. Last updated . Page title: . Retrieved from The Backyard Nature Website at .